There’s this thing that has made me feel like there’s something subtly wrong on the way out from the auditorium after chapel, and I’ve finally figured it out. It’s the rock-bottom number of doors open for egress of this large crowd.
One half of the issue is the number of doors open, say, inefficient method, enough prefects to open many more doors, and all that.
As for the other half, let’s take a look at the doors. They’re bulky bulky and have door closers on the top which create or restrict movement of the door as appropriate. Now, when students attempt to open a door, there’s usually a prefect (or two) on the other side waiting to keep it closed, or to close it.
That’s the dangerous part, because of the combination of body weight of the prefect as well as the weight and momentum of the door. Imagine if someone has his hand on the door frame when opening it, then it slams shut, hard. Last year, we had something like this (albeit with a closet door in a classroom), and the poor guy ended up with one injured finger for a very long time. Now, multiply the force exerted and door’s weight/momentum/[insert relevant property] by a few magnitudes, and add in a few more fingers or the palm itself, and you get disaster.
Ideally, we should not be crossing our fingers (pun unintended) and hoping or praying that this will not happen. Assuming they refuse to open more/all doors, maybe they can lock the ‘unauthorised’ doors; if that’s not a suitable or legal move, let’s do crowd control inside the venue as well. While I suppose the School’s group (insurance) policy for students might or might not cover this, it’s always better not to have to invoke that or any other policy you might hold. You know, premiums rise now and then..





